شناسایی و رتبه بندی ملاحظات صنعت و فناوری در انتقال فناوری های پیشرفته در سطوح گوناگون آمادگی فناوری (TRLs)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد کارآفرینی- کسب وکار جدید دانشکدة کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت راهبردی، دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

موضوع اصلی پژوهش حاضر مطالعة ملاحظات صنعت و فناوری در فرایند انتقال فناوری­های پیشرفته توأم با درنظرگرفتن سطوح آمادگی فناوری است. به اهمیت این موضوع از این منظر تأکید می‌شود که سطوح گوناگون آمادگی فناوری، ملاحظات ویژه‌ای دارد و درنظرگرفتن آن از مخاطرات انتقال فناوری­های پیشرفته می­کاهد. هدف اصلی این پژوهش شناسایی و رتبه­بندی ملاحظات صنعت و فناوری در انتقال فناوری­های پیشرفته در سطوح گوناگون آمادگی فناوری است. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی است و داده­های آن به شیوة آمیخته گردآوری شد. یافته­های پژوهش نشان می­دهد 32 جزء در قالب هفت بُعد به‌عنوان ملاحظات صنعت و فناوری بر انتقال فناوری­های پیشرفته تأثیرگذار است. تأثیر این عوامل در سطوح گوناگون آمادگی فناوری، متفاوت است. به‌گونه­ای که با پیش‌رفتن به‌سوی سطوح آمادگی بالاتر (از 1 تا 9)، تأثیر ملاحظات صنعت از تأثیر ملاحظات فناوری بیشتر می­شود. براساس نتایج پژوهش، درنظرگرفتن ملاحظات صنعت و فناوری و میزان تأثیر آن در سطوح گوناگون آمادگی فناوری، به شرکت‌هایی توصیه می­شود که در حوزة انتقال فناوری­های پیشرفته فعالیت می­کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and ranking the industry and technology considerations affecting transfer of high technologies at various Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Esmaeel Kalantari 1
  • Jahanshah Charkhtab Moghadam 2
1 MSc., Entrepreneurship- New Business, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Iran
2 PhD Candidate, Strategic Management, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

 The current research aims to study the industrial and technological concerns within transfer process of high-tech regarding the technology readiness levels (TRLs). The importance of the subject is emphasized because different TRLs have special considerations and the risks of high-tech transfer can be reduced considering them. The main goal of this study is to identify and rank the industrial and technological concerns in transfer of high-tech at various levels of technology readiness. The study is applied-type and the data were collected using mixed method. Research findings show that 32 elements as seven aspects of industry and technology considerations influence the transfer of high-techs. The influence of these factors varies at various TRLs, such that as we move toward higher readiness levels (1 to 9), the influence of industry considerations is more than that of technology considerations. It is highly recommended for companies active in the field of high-techs transfer to take into account industry and technology considerations and their influences on different TRLs.



 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • High Technologies
  • identification and ranking
  • industry and technology considerations
  • Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs)
  • Technology Transfer (TT)
Al-Mabrouk, K. & Soar, J. (2009). An analysis of the major issues for successful information technology transfer in Arab countries. Enterprise Information Management, 22(5): 504- 522.
 
Amani, J., et al. (2012). The introduction of structural equation modeling, partial least squares method and its application in the study of behavior. Journal of Online Psychological Science, 1: 41-55. (In Persian)
 
Arabi, S. A. (2007). Methods of Technology Transfer. Tadbir Monthly, 179: 54-63. (In Persian)
 
Awny, M. M. (2005). Transfer and implementation processes in developing countries. International Journal of Technology Management, 32: 213–220.
 
Bezik, F. (1985). technology transfer, translated by: Jalaliziba , publishing company science & culture.Tehran. (In Persian)
 
Biernacki, P. & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball Sampling: Problems and techniques of Chain Referral Sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2): 325-328.
 
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29: 627-655.
 
Davari, A. (2012). Smart PLS Education, faculty of entrepreneurship, Tehran University. Tehran. (In Persian)
 
Farsijani, H. & Tarabandeh, M. A. (2013) Clarifying the role of technology transfer in the product design phase QFD (Iran transformer). Industrial Management Journal, 2(4): 103-120. (In Persian)
 
Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, N. (2008). Identifying Factors Influencing on Trend of Technology Transfer in Iran (Case Study: L90). Faculty of Management, ???: 80-126. (In Persian)
 
Gholami Jorshari, M. (2012). Specification the Level of Technology Readiness of Fuel Cell in Iran. 3rd Conference of Bio Energy in Iran. Tehran: 20-32. (In Persian)
 
Gibson, D. V. & Smilor, R. W. (1991). Key variables in technology transfer: A field-study based empirical analysis. Engineering and Technology Management, 8: 287-312.
 
Greiner, M. A. & Franza, R. M. (2003). Barriers and Bridges for Successful Environmental Technology Transfer. Technology Transfer, 28: 167–177.
 
Houman, H. A. & Asgari, A. (2005). Factor Analysis. Psycology and Cultural Sciences, 35(2): 1-20. (In Persian)
 
Jin-fu, W. & Rui, H. )2010(. Improve the University Technology Transfer: Factors and Framework. Second International Conference on Communication Systems, Networks and Applications, Hong Kong.
 
Kalantari, E. & Meigoun Poori, M. R. (2012). Identifying Factors Influencing on Choosing Academic Researches Commercialization Strategies in the Field of Nanotechnology in Iran. faculty of Entrepreneurship, ???: 135- 150. (In Persian)
 
Karimi, D., Mokhtarzadeh, N. & Yazdani, H. R. (2010). Effects of Technology Transfer on the Competitive Performance of Firms: The Case Study. Industrial Management Journal, 2(4): 111-112. (In Persian)
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research, Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc. New York.
 
Khamenei, S. A. (2013). General Policies of Resistance Economic: http://farsi.khamenei.ir. (In Persian)
 
Kuzel, A. J. (1999). Sampling in Qualitative Inquiry, Doing Qualitative Research, Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA.
 
Lai, W. & Tsai, C. (2009). Fuzzy rule-based analysis of firm’s technology transfer in Taiwan’s machinery industry. Expert Systems with applications, 36: 12012-12022.
 
Lashkari, M. (1999). Technology Transfer in Qazvin, Modarres University. Tehran. (In Persian)
 
Lee, A. H., Wang, W. & Lin, T. (2010). An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77: 135-150.
 
Lin, B. & Berg, D. (2001). Effects of cultural differences on TT projects: an emirical study of Taiwanese manufacturing companies. International Journal of Project Management, 19: 287-293.
 
Lindolf, T. R. & Taylor, B. C. (2010). Qualitative Communication Research Methods, Sage Publication. USA.
 
Madu, C. N. (1989). Transferring technology to developing countries critical factors for success. Long Range Planning, 22(4): 115 -124.
 
Mahdizadeh, M., Heyderi Ghare Bagh, H. & Mirzaii, Y. (2010). Identifying Factors Influencing on Technology Transfer. Technology Development Journal, 25: 3-10. (In Persian)
 
Movahedi, B. (2003). Modes of technology transfer in Iranian firms, PhD Dissertation, ???. ???. (In Persian)
 
Nahar, N., Lyytinen, K., Huda, N. & Muravyov, S. V. (2006). Success factors for information technology supported international technology transfer: Finding expert consensus. Information and Management, 43: 663–677.
 
NASA. (2004). Definitions of TRLs for components and subsystems and systems report.
 
Phillips, R. G. )2002(. Technology business incubators: how effective as technologytransfer mechanisms. Technology in Society, 24: 299-316.
 
Saad, M., Cicmil, S. & Greenwood, M. (2002). Technology transfer projects in developing countries furthering the Project Management perspectives. Project Management, 20: 617-625.
 
Saremi, M., Hoseini, S. M., Mohaghar, A. & Heydari, A. (2009). Proposing a Qualitative Model for Competetive Advantage in High Tech Industries. Industrial Management Journal, 1(3): 53-68. (In Persian)