بررسی شرایط حاکم بر مدیریت ریسک عرضه در زنجیرة تأمین صنعت خودرو: نظریه ای برخاسته از داده‌ها

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تولید و عملیات، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

این مقاله در پی شناسایی و بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر فرایند مدیریت ریسک عرضه در زنجیرة تأمین صنعت خودرو و چگونگی اثرگذاری این عوامل بر فرایند مذکور است. با اتکا به رویکرد نظریة‌ برخاسته از داده‌ها و نتایج سیزده مصاحبة‌ کیفی عمیق با ده تن از مدیران و کارشناسان زنجیرة تأمین صنعت ‌خودرو، چارچوبی نظری برای بررسی این عوامل، صورت‌بندی شد. بر مبنای این چارچوب، عوامل بسیاری موجب تحریک خودروساز برای ورود به فرایند مدیریت ریسک عرضه می‌شوند. این عوامل، با عنوان مقولة عوامل فرایند ادراکی- اسنادی دسته‌بندی شدند. همچنین عوامل زمینه‌ای و اقتضایی متنوعی بر تصمیم­های خودروساز در این فرایند اثر می‌گذارند و موجب هدایت تعامل­های وی با تأمین‌کنندگان می‌شوند. این عوامل نیز با عنوان مقولة عوامل بسترساز و عوامل اقتضایی نامگذاری شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explanation of factors affecting supply risk management in automotive industry supply chain: A Grounded Theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Simkhah 1
  • Kamran Feizi 2
  • Laya Olfat 3
  • Maghsod Amiri 2
1 Ph.D. Student, Allame Tabatabaei University, Tehran,Iran
2 Prof., Allame Tabatabaei University, Tehran,Iran
3 Associate Prof., Allame Tabatabaei University, Tehran,Iran
چکیده [English]

 This article aims to identify what and how factors influence management of supply risk in automotive industry supply chain. Based on grounded theory and 13qualitative in-depth interviews with 10 managers in Iran's automotive industry supply chain, a theoretical framework is developed to examine antecedents and effective factors of this process. This framework suggests a broad range of factors causing an automobile manufacturer to manage the supply risk. These factors are called perceptual-attributive factors. In addition varied contextual and intervening factors are affecting automobile manufacturer decisions thereby guiding their actions/reactions in this process. Such factors are categorized as bedder factors and contingency factors.



 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • automotive supply chain
  • Grounded theory
  • supply risk
 
Aguilar, J. (1984). Trust and exchange: expressive and instrumental dimensions of reciprocity in a peasant community, Ethos, 12(1): 3-29.
Bazargan, A. (2008). Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods: Common approaches in behavioral science. Didar. Tehran. (In Persian)
Chopra, S. & Meindle, P. (2007). Supply chain management. Prentice Hall. Harlow.
Cousins, P., Lamming, R. C. and Bowen, F. (2004). The role of risk in environment-related initiatives, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(6): 554-565.
Daft, R. (2000). Organization theory and design, Cultural research Bureau. Tehran. (In Persian )
Deshmukh, V. (2007). The design of a decision support system for supply chain risk management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Massachusetts.
Frosdick, M. (1997). The techniques of risk management are insufficient in themselves. Disaster Prevention and Management, 6(3): 165-177.
Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn’t so. Simon and Schuster. New York.
Hatch, M. (2007). Organization theory: modern, symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Afkar press. Tehran. (In Persian)
Hendricks, K. B. & Singhal, V. R. (2005). An empirical analysis of the effects of supply chain disruption on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production and Operations Management, 14(1): 35-52.
Hines, P., Lamming, R., Jones, D., Cousins, P. & Rich, N. (1999). Value stream management: Strategy and excellence in the supply chain. Prentice-Hall. Harlow.
Hood, J. & Young, P. (2005). Risk financing in UK local authorities: Is there a case for risk pooling? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(6): 563-578.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47: 263-291.
Kilgore, M. (2003). Mitigating Supply Chain Risks. White Paper, Chainalytics LLC. Atlanta.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin. Boston.
Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5): 109-117.
Lewis, M. (2003). Cause, consequence and control: towards a theoretical and practical model of operational risk, Journal of Operations Management, 21(2): 205-224.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications. Beverly Hills.
Lowrance, W. W. (1980). The nature of risk. Plenum Press. New York.
March, J. G. & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11): 1404-1418.
Mello, J. & Flint, D. (2009). A refined view of Grounded Theory and its application to logistics research, Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1): 107-125.
Minahan, TA. (2005). The Supply Risk Benchmark Report. Aberdeen Group. Boston.
Mir Ghafuri, S. Morvati Sharifabadi, A. Asadian Ardakani, F. (2012). Evaluation of Suppliers Risk in Supply Chain Using Combining Fuzzy VIKOR and GRA Techniques. Journal of Industrial Management, 4 (2): 153-178. (In Persian)
Mitchell, V.W. (1995). Organisational risk perception and reduction: a literature review. British Journal of Management, 6: 115-133.
Moore, P. G. (1983). The Business of Risk. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
Nan, J. Zhen, H. (2008). Supply risk identification and analysis of iron and steel enterprises Supply Chain Based on Social System Theory. IEEE, 1-4.
Odean, T. (1998). Volume, volatility, price and profit when all traders are above average, The Journal of Finance, 53(6): 1887-1934.
Radjou, N. (2002). Adapting to supply network change. Forrester Research Inc, Cambridge.
Ramsay, J. (1996). The case against purchasing partnerships. .International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(4): 13-19.
Robbins, A. (2000). Organization theory (structure, design, application). Saffar press. Tehran. (In Persian)
Robbins, A. (2003). Organizational behavior: concepts, controversies, application. Cultural research Bureau. Tehran. (In Persian)
Rowe, W. (1980). Risk assessment: approaches and method. Academic Press. London.
Russo, J. E. & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1992). Managing overconfidence, Sloan Management Review, 33: 7-17.
Sachan, A. & Datta, S. (2005). Review of supply chain management and logistics research. .International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(9/10): 664-705.
Simchi-Levi, D. Kaminesky, P. Simchi-Levi, E. (2008). Designing and Management the Supply Chain, MacGraw-Hill. Irwin.
Simchi-Levi, D. Kaminesky, P. Simchi-Levi, E. (2009). Designing and Management the Supply Chain, Sharif university press. Tehran. (In Persian)
Simon, P., Hillson, D. & Newland, K. (1997). Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide (PRAM). Association for Project Management, Norwich.
Slack, N. & Lewis, M. (2001). Operations strategy, Prentice-Hall. Harlow.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Thousand Oaks. California.
Waters, D. (2007). Global Logistics. Kogan page limited. London.
Waters, D. (2007). Supply chain risk management, Kogan page limited. London.
Womack, J. P. & Jones, D. T. (2005). Lean solutions: How companies and customers can create weals.
Yates, J.F. & Stone, E. ( (1992). The risk construct. Wiley. Chichester.
Zsidisin, G.A., Ellram, L.M., Carter, J.R. and Cavinato, J. L. (2004). An analysis of supply risk assessment techniques, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34)5(: 397-413.