Optimizing Cost Management in Construction Projects: A Sustainability Assessment Model Using Fuzzy Inference Systems (Case Study of the Apadana Project in the Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industries Company)

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Finance, College of Management. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Prof., Department of Production and Operations Management, Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 MSC, Department of Production and Operations Management, Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/imj.2025.384018.1008196

چکیده

Objective: The construction industry has been increasingly criticized for its poor sustainability performance in recent decades, creating a chance for the sector to play a key role in global sustainability efforts. Rapid technological advancements and increasing construction project complexities have driven the need for flexible, sustainability-focused project management frameworks. This study introduces a fuzzy inference system designed to evaluate construction project sustainability, built on insights from extensive literature and expert input.
Methods: To design the proposed model, the system inputs—criteria for evaluating the sustainability level of construction projects at various layers—were first identified. Next, the necessary if-then rules were developed based on expert opinions. The system output was determined in alignment with the research’s final objective. By offering a comprehensive assessment of construction project sustainability, the model enables organizations to identify their strengths and weaknesses, assess their current position, and make informed decisions to enhance their sustainable performance. 
Results: The output of the research includes a detailed analysis of the sustainability performance of construction projects. The designed model, along with its measurement tools, provides an opportunity for leaders and managers in the construction industry who are concerned about sustainability to gradually enhance their sustainability status and advance the sustainability level of projects. This model consists of three subsystems named the Direction, Execution, and Results subsystems. The aforementioned subsystems are the result of a literature review and are considered inputs to the final level of the model.
Conclusion: The designed model serves as a tool to identify and implement improvement methods and potential areas for project advancement from a sustainability perspective. By utilizing this model, the quality of project execution in line with sustainability indicators, while addressing all three dimensions—economic, social, and environmental—improves continuously and proportionately.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Optimizing Cost Management in Construction Projects: A Sustainability Assessment Model Using Fuzzy Inference Systems (Case Study of the Apadana Project in the Persian Gulf Petrochemical Industries Company)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Ebrahimi Kordlar 1
  • Hossein Safari 2
  • Mohammad Rozbeh 3
1 Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Finance, College of Management. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Prof., Department of Production and Operations Management, Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 MSC, Department of Production and Operations Management, Faculty of Industrial and Technology Management, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Objective: The construction industry has been increasingly criticized for its poor sustainability performance in recent decades, creating a chance for the sector to play a key role in global sustainability efforts. Rapid technological advancements and increasing construction project complexities have driven the need for flexible, sustainability-focused project management frameworks. This study introduces a fuzzy inference system designed to evaluate construction project sustainability, built on insights from extensive literature and expert input.
Methods: To design the proposed model, the system inputs—criteria for evaluating the sustainability level of construction projects at various layers—were first identified. Next, the necessary if-then rules were developed based on expert opinions. The system output was determined in alignment with the research’s final objective. By offering a comprehensive assessment of construction project sustainability, the model enables organizations to identify their strengths and weaknesses, assess their current position, and make informed decisions to enhance their sustainable performance. 
Results: The output of the research includes a detailed analysis of the sustainability performance of construction projects. The designed model, along with its measurement tools, provides an opportunity for leaders and managers in the construction industry who are concerned about sustainability to gradually enhance their sustainability status and advance the sustainability level of projects. This model consists of three subsystems named the Direction, Execution, and Results subsystems. The aforementioned subsystems are the result of a literature review and are considered inputs to the final level of the model.
Conclusion: The designed model serves as a tool to identify and implement improvement methods and potential areas for project advancement from a sustainability perspective. By utilizing this model, the quality of project execution in line with sustainability indicators, while addressing all three dimensions—economic, social, and environmental—improves continuously and proportionately.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable Project Management
  • Sustainable Construction
  • Fuzzy Inference System
Adewumi, A. S., Opoku, A., & Dangana, Z. (2024). Sustainability assessment frameworks for delivering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) targets: a case of building research establishment environmental assessment method (BREEAM) UK new construction. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management31(5), 3779-3791.https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2768
Chen, H., Cheng, S., Qin, Y., Xu, W., & Liu, Y. (2024). Sustainability evaluation of urban large-scale infrastructure construction based on dynamic fuzzy cognitive map. Journal of Cleaner Production449, 141774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141774
Ershadi, M., & Goodarzi, F. (2021). Core capabilities for achieving sustainable construction project management. Sustainable Production and Consumption28, 1396-1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.020
Fathalizadeh, A., Hosseini, M. R., Silvius, A. G., Rahimian, A., Martek, I., & Edwards, D. J. (2021). Barriers impeding sustainable project management: A Social Network Analysis of the Iranian construction sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128405.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128405
Hatefi, S. M., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2018). Construction projects assessment based on the sustainable development criteria by an integrated fuzzy AHP and improved GRA model. Sustainability10(4), 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040991
Hendiani, S., & Bagherpour, M. (2019). Developing an integrated index to assess social sustainability in construction industry using fuzzy logic. Journal of cleaner production, 230, 647-662.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.055
Irfan, M., Alaloul, W. S., Ghufran, M., Yaseen, G., Thaheem, M. J., Qureshi, A. H., & Bilal, M. (2022). Analyzing the impact of organizational culture on social sustainability: a perspective of the construction industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02751-3
J El-Sayegh, S., & Romdhane, L. (2022). Identification and assessment of sustainability performance indicators for construction projects. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 100193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100193
Jaafari, A. (2007). Project and program diagnostics: A systemic approach. International Journal of Project Management25(8), 781-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.008
Jaradat, H., Alshboul, O. A. M., Obeidat, I. M., & Zoubi, M. K. (2023). Green building, carbon emission, and environmental sustainability of construction industry in Jordan: Awareness, actions and barriers. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102441
Karimi, A., Safari, H., Hashemi, S. H., &Kalantar, P. (2014). A study of the Baldrige award framework using the applicant scoring data. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.830386
 Karji, A., Woldesenbet, A., Khanzadi, M., & Tafazzoli, M. (2019). Assessment of social sustainability indicators in mass housing construction: a case study of Mehr housing project. Sustainable Cities and Society50, 101697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101697
Kerzner, H. (2002). Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Khahro, S. H., Memon, A. H., Memon, N. A., Memon, Z. A., & Naresh, R. (2023). Influence of Social and Economic Factors on Construction Project Performance in Pakistan. Sustainability15(3), 2469. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su15032469 
Khalifeh, A., Farrell, P., & Al-edenat, M. (2020). The impact of project sustainability management (PSM) on project success: A systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development39(4), 453-474.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0045
Khan, M. A., Wang, C. C., & Lee, C. L. (2021). A framework for developing green building rating tools based on Pakistan’s local context. Buildings11(5), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11050202
Kiani Mavi, R., Gengatharen, D., Kiani Mavi, N., Hughes, R., Campbell, A., & Yates, R. (2021). Sustainability in construction projects: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(4), 1932.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041932
Kosieradzka, A. (2017). Maturity model for production management. Procedia Engineering182, 342-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.109
Kwak, Y. H. (2005). A brief history of project management. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Lam, T. Y. (2022). Driving sustainable construction development through post-contract key performance indicators and drivers. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment11(3), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2020-0111
Lianying, Z., Jing, H., & Xinxing, Z. (2012). The project management maturity model and application based on PRINCE2. Procedia Engineering, 29, 3691-3697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.554
Liu, B., Xue, B., & Chen, X. (2021). Development of a metric system measuring infrastructure sustainability: Empirical studies of Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production278, 123904.40533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123904
Machado, F., Duarte, N., & Amaral, A. (2023). Project Management Maturity in Renovation and Remodelling Construction Firms. Buildings13(2), 557. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020557
Machado, F., Duarte, N., Amaral, A., & Barros, T. (2021). Project management maturity models for construction firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management14(12), 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120571
Marrero, M., Rivero-Camacho, C., Martínez-Rocamora, A., Alba-Rodríguez, D., & Lucas-Ruiz, V. (2024). Holistic assessment of the economic, environmental, and social impact of building construction. Application to housing construction in Andalusia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140170
Martens, M. L., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Sustainability and success variables in the project management context: an expert panel. Project Management Journal47(6), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972816047006
Mavi, R. K., & Standing, C. (2018). Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach. Journal of cleaner production194, 751-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.120
Meadows, D. H., et al. (2018). The limits to growth. In K. Conca & G. D. Dabelko (Eds.), Green planet blues. (6th ed., pp. 25-29). Routledge.
Mirpanahi, M. V., & Noorzai, E. (2021). Modeling the relationship between critical BIM attributes and environmental sustainability criteria using PLS-SEM technique. Journal of Architectural Engineering27(4), 04021037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000512
Morris and Hough. The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. Wiley 1987.
Moshood, T. D., Rotimi, J. O., & Shahzad, W. (2024). Enhancing sustainability considerations in construction industry projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04946-2
Nikolaenko, V., & Sidorov, A. (2023). Assessment of Project Management Maturity Models Strengths and Weaknesses. Journal of Risk and Financial Management16(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16020121
Rodrigues, L., Delgado, J. M., Mendes, A., Lima, A. G., & Guimarães, A. S. (2023). Sustainability assessment of buildings indicators. Sustainability, 15(4), 3403. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043403
Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Jhamb, D. (2023). What makes people hesitant from circularity: An analysis of risk, marketing mix, cost and inconvenience. Journal of Consumer Behaviour.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2143
Sirin, O., Gunduz, M., & Al Nawaiseh, H. M. (2024). Developing an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System for Performance Evaluation of Pavement Construction Projects. Sustainability16(9), 3771.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093771
Stanitsas, M., Kirytopoulos, K., & Leopoulos, V. (2021). Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123774.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123774
WCED, U. (1987). Our common future—The Brundtland report. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, 11.‏
Yu, W. D., Cheng, S. T., Ho, W. C., & Chang, Y. H. (2018). Measuring the Sustainability of construction projects throughout their lifecycle: A Taiwan lesson. Sustainability10(5), 1523.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051523
a